The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

Blog Article

nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and a hundred and twenty from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.

Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal has not still been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help in the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. Read more

In the event you find an error from the written content of a published opinion (like a misspelled name or maybe a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is well-settled that when taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to think about the advantage of every one of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these qualified candidates who are found being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded with the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part with the respondent department.

Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination for the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers from the District Judiciary is within the obvious negation of your legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 here times. If your appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety times for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.

10. Based about the findings with the inquiry committee, this petition isn't viewed as maintainable and it is therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could be one particular or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for your decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could possibly be adopted within an argument.

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more